Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41238 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2009 11:08:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2009 11:08:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 73459 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2009 11:08:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 72925 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2009 11:08:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 72914 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2009 11:08:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:08:49 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.15 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.15] (HELO mail-fx0-f15.google.com) (209.85.220.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:08:41 +0000 Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so142012fxm.19 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:08:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y0nzwhz294QIo3ANlubPmfJoepenyV79sRA/y6F885E=; b=v1eZHckd0U3knh5/YBOHMWUz/B/X3P7wx3PU7UyJz47YM6uUSgFgQkhWkEAYnFuJJG VdWgqXXvas0seFuQnYLqtt0uZ6AsRIO+S5HKxtLG9RUQSgQuXl7c2h3ob/7SFy7VitBS fB3JXlJjvuQ/KIKzfsSkblLzDlNv8GLOPuPRY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZUCEkmSFHCXARlg6uXZARBqoV1eb/DfW6LjRAsqEbeuqOMdGH653oNN+ock2ZsCJaa 5m01vI3UVQ3OAr1RnBxVd7kPbenZ8wbg8FpeajQ/0DnxgLSmyWObEuuP57ly5rZqPVwI tNluZFwGOBRI+fCm5F+5Ac1+L9nnAT2ZVcFAQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.109.199 with SMTP id k7mr892928fap.45.1234782296847; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:04:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <234efe30902160247t7ceb2010h123dfd3a5f523f91@mail.gmail.com> References: <234efe30902110011y6d883332t9b60220cbd0a6b8d@mail.gmail.com> <234efe30902120924g7f545008q6ae491e4f8c998a2@mail.gmail.com> <234efe30902120932o328b054aqd941f18f059920da@mail.gmail.com> <234efe30902121112l43acf62aofc955355badedbd4@mail.gmail.com> <90a8d1c00902130051k6c53e34bsbf7c122fb56534fc@mail.gmail.com> <234efe30902160247t7ceb2010h123dfd3a5f523f91@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:04:56 +0100 Message-ID: <90a8d1c00902160304n43df1eebrb7c0e9defa349563@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Q: Using JackRabbit as a distributed file store From: Stefan Guggisberg To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Shaul Dar wrote: > I was told by someone that JCR 2.X will support WAN distribution, and also > see the following in the roadmap ( > http://jackrabbit.apache.org/jackrabbit-roadmap.html) > Am I misunderstanding? Thanks, probably. i am still puzzled... what list item are you refering to as 'WAN distribution'? WebDAV remoting? this refers to remoting the JCR api by using the WebDAV transport underneath (as an alternative to RMI). however, i can confirm that there's no 'WAN distribution' feature planned for JCR 2.0. cheers stefan > > -- Shaul > Medium term > > - Apache Jackrabbit 2.0 > - JCR 2.0 support > - Transactional versioning > - WebDAV remoting > - Hot backup > - Full XPath > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Stefan Guggisberg < > stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Shaul Dar wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I hope you can help me with the following. I apologize for the length of >> > this message... >> > >> > My organization (non-profit) has a need for what I think of as a >> > distributed, virtual file system. The idea is to abstract logical files >> and >> > folders from their physical location. I.e. logical file = handle, >> physical >> > file = data. >> > >> > There are 2 main user categories: (1) normal users = content creators >> (e.g. >> > video, audio and docs) need to deposit files into logical folders (i.e. >> > create "logical files"), and give them properties (e.g. file content >> type, >> > intended audience). Based on predefined rules, the file should >> > automatically be moved to 1 or more physical servers in the 3 worldwide >> > locations we have, and stored there using the local file system (Windows, >> > Linux etc). (2) Administrators need to control file distribution, i.e. >> > mapping of logical files to physical replicas (e.g. delete/add replicas). >> > >> > We need a Web GUI for users and admins. Should support the logical folder >> > system (create space, create/delete move folder etc), search (by file >> name, >> > size, date created or last modified, and possibly hash value), and a >> > coarse-grain permissions system (e.g. user vs. admin). The back-end >> should >> > perform the necessary file transfers, e.g. add/fetch a replica >> (reliably), >> > preferably over HTTP (i.e. OS agnostic). In between should be a mapping >> > layer that maps logical files to physical files. All metadata should be >> kept >> > in a DB (MySQL). >> > >> > To clarify, I am aware of distributed file systems (*FS), this is not >> what I >> > am looking for. I am looking rather for (1) management piece (Web based >> > interface) described above + (2) the physical transfer layer, and (3) the >> > layer that maps logical/physical files. >> > >> > So my questions are: does JackRabbit provide what we want? Having read >> thru >> > the documentation, I am still unclear on whether it is a framework or a >> > full-blown system, and does it have only back-end components or also a >> > front-end. In short, I'm trying to understand how much we would need to >> > develop? I saw that Day is developing a commercial system, but for a >> hefty >> > sum - is there a free alternative? Also I understand that JackRabbit >> > currently supports JCR 1.x, which does not include distribution across >> > locations? Is there an estimate when it will support JCR 2.x, i.e. >> > WAN distribution? >> >> what makes you think JCR 2.X is about WAN distribution? >> >> cheers >> stefan >