Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <22134956.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:07:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Akil Ali <Akil.Ajani@cognizant.com>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance test conducted on Jackrabbit
In-Reply-To: <91f3b2650902180113s4233464dk540846cfe4b6ec86@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <22011732.post@talk.nabble.com> <22074819.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <91f3b2650902180113s4233464dk540846cfe4b6ec86@mail.gmail.com>


Hi Thomas,

                I would be thankful to you if could more explain about
caching. since i have seen the wiki part it more about configuration.
What are the good setting for the cache that helps us to increase the read
count for the document per second.?

If you could point to a good article other than WIKI that could help me for
the same would be thankful.


Thomas M=C3=BCller-2 wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
>> There is only slightly difference between both the operation.> the reaso=
n
> behind this time difference.
>=20
> The reason could be caching.
>=20
> Regards,
> Thomas
>=20
>=20

--=20
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-test-conduc=
ted-on-Jackrabbit-tp22011732p22134956.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.