Hi Alex, i would be thankful to you, if you could reply for my previous post 1>Need your suggestion for the jackrabbit implementation. 2>Help required to create jackrabbit repository from the options available to me Akil Alexander Klimetschek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Akil Ali > wrote: >> >> In my application i am not using any custom node type. all the node that >> are >> created are nt:unstructured but as per the following information >> >> Each Jackrabbit instance has a NodeTypeRegistry which is created on >> start-up >> and populated with the set of built-in node types (these include both >> those >> required by the JCR specification and others required by the Jackrabbit >> implementation). >> of http://jackrabbit.apache.org/node-types.html. >> >> do i need to create the CND file >> >> i have a CND file it looks like >> /* orig.namespaces */ >> >> >> >> >> [nt:document] >  nt:file >> - jcr:description (string) >> - jcr:versionComment (string) >> - jcr:creationDate (date) >> - jcr:lastModified (date) >> - jcr:attachedFileName (string) >> - jcr:attachedFileSize (string) >> - jcr:creator (string) >> - jcr:modifier (string) >> - jcr:checkedOutBy (string) >> - jcr:title (string) >> - jcr:discussionComment (string) >> - jcr:commentBy (string) >> >> can you please help me to interpret this file. what my understanding >> is,we >> are trying to create a custom node called document that has the following >> properties >> >> - jcr:description (string) >> - jcr:versionComment (string) >> - jcr:creationDate (date) >> - jcr:lastModified (date) >> - jcr:attachedFileName (string) >> - jcr:attachedFileSize (string) >> - jcr:creator (string) >> - jcr:modifier (string) >> - jcr:checkedOutBy (string) >> - jcr:title (string) >> - jcr:discussionComment (string) >> - jcr:commentBy (string) >> >> Please correct me if i am wrong > > Yes, you would register that cnd file through the node type registry. > But as Julian already noted, don't use the "jcr" or the "nt" > namespaces for custom nodes and properties. Use something like > "my:document" instead of "nt:document" and "my:discussionComment" > instead of "jcr:discussionComment", for example. For property names > it's mostly better to skip the namespace prefix alltogether, eg. have > "discussionComment". > > Regards, > Alex > > -- > Alexander Klimetschek > alexander.klimetschek@day.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/What-is-the-use-of-Registering-Node-Types-tp22218021p22226751.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.