jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com>
Subject Re: Performance test conducted on Jackrabbit
Date Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:33:55 GMT

               I would be thankful to you if could more explain about
> caching.

I'm sorry there is not much to explain. You asked about what could be the
reason for the difference, and caching could be the reason.

> since i have seen the wiki part it more about configuration.

Sorry, which part?

> What are the good setting for the cache that helps us to increase the read
> count for the document per second.?

A bigger cache should be faster, however it uses more memory.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message