Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Sender: alessandro.cosenza@itkey.it
From: "Alessandro Cosenza" <alessandro.cosenza@itkey.it>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: removing a node needs to verify a WRITE or a REMOVE permission?
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:13:01 +0100
Message-id: <49773b7d.172.2a0f.1559367094@webmaildh2.aruba.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

i'm using 1.4

----- Original Message -----
Da : Angela Schreiber <anchela@day.com>
A : users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Oggetto : Re: removing a node needs to verify a WRITE or a
REMOVE permission?
Data : Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:11:02 +0100

> hi
> 
> what version of jackrabbit are you using?
> 
> with the initial steps for jsr 283 security features
> the AccessManager permissions have been deprecated.
> 
> as far as i am aware of AccessManager.isGranted(ItemId,
> int) is (with the latest version of jackrabbit) only used
> for READ access and those are prone to be replaced
> as well.
> 
> angela
> 
> > hi,
> > when i call a Node.remove() method it seems JR always
> > try to check
> > a WRITE permission (not a REMOVE one) in my
> > AccessManagerImpl.isGranted().
> > i could think it's right, but in which cases a REMOVE
> > permission is checked?
> > thanks in advance.
> > 
> > 
>