jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alessandro Cosenza" <alessandro.cose...@itkey.it>
Subject Re: removing a node needs to verify a WRITE or a REMOVE permission?
Date Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:16:21 GMT
so when i do node.remove( ) first WRITE is checked and then REMOVE???
i tried to debug my application but i wasn't able to get a point where 
AccessManager.isGranted is called with
AccessManager.REMOVE passed-in parameter.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stefan Guggisberg" <stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com>
To: <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: removing a node needs to verify a WRITE or a REMOVE permission?


> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alessandro Cosenza
> <alessandro.cosenza@itkey.it> wrote:
>> so please does anyone can tell me in which cases REMOVE
>> permissions are checked in JR 1.4.
>> When i remove a node a WRITE permission is checked on parent
>> node instead of a REMOVE one.
>> why?
>
> in jackrabbit (and AFAIK in JCR in general) removing or adding a node
> does modify
> the parent node.
>
> in jackrabbit 1.4, removing a node does check WRITE on parent node and
> subsequently
> REMOVE on target.
>
> cheers
> stefan
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> Da : "Alessandro Cosenza" <alessandro.cosenza@itkey.it>
>> A : users@jackrabbit.apache.org
>> Oggetto : Re: removing a node needs to verify a WRITE or a
>> REMOVE permission?
>> Data : Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:13:01 +0100
>>
>>> i'm using 1.4
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> Da : Angela Schreiber <anchela@day.com>
>>> A : users@jackrabbit.apache.org
>>> Oggetto : Re: removing a node needs to verify a WRITE or a
>>> REMOVE permission?
>>> Data : Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:11:02 +0100
>>>
>>> > hi
>>> >
>>> > what version of jackrabbit are you using?
>>> >
>>> > with the initial steps for jsr 283 security features
>>> > the AccessManager permissions have been deprecated.
>>> >
>>> > as far as i am aware of AccessManager.isGranted(ItemId,
>>> > int) is (with the latest version of jackrabbit) only
>>> > used for READ access and those are prone to be replaced
>>> > as well.
>>> >
>>> > angela
>>> >
>>> > > hi,
>>> > > when i call a Node.remove() method it seems JR always
>>> > > try to check
>>> > > a WRITE permission (not a REMOVE one) in my
>>> > > AccessManagerImpl.isGranted().
>>> > > i could think it's right, but in which cases a REMOVE
>>> > > permission is checked?
>>> > > thanks in advance.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo.
Controllato da AVG - http://www.avg.com
Versione: 8.0.176 / Database dei virus: 270.10.10/1906 -  Data di rilascio: 
21/01/2009 7.07


Mime
View raw message