jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Angela Schreiber <anch...@day.com>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit RMI Performance
Date Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:59:42 GMT
> - using the SPI interface, which is kind of a "batch-optimized" and
> smaller API compared to JCR, but provides the same feature set

just for clarification: the SPI is an internal layer
and not meant to be used *instead* of the JCR API.

if you are looking for JCR in a remoted environment
and decide to take advantage of the SPI you are
still encouraged to use the JCR API. the difference is
that you will then use the jackrabbit-jcr2spi JCR
implementation instead of jackrabbit-core.

nevertheless:
i will put an extended version of the spi2dav into
the sandbox as soon as i get along ((actually i promised
to have that done in january)). it uses json blocks
for batch-read and batch write... anyway... i will write
some lines when i'm done...

angela

Mime
View raw message