Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anchela@day.com designates
 207.126.148.183 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <492BC4E2.7030704@day.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:26:58 +0100
From: Angela Schreiber <anchela@day.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Which RepositoryFactory for WebDAV?]
References: <4925A758.4090303@sun.com>
 <c3ac3bad0811201016p75cbac56x6959b6698cac2710@mail.gmail.com>
 <4925B058.2010301@sun.com>
 <c3ac3bad0811201144j2ce14ae9h9bb3174bae406aa@mail.gmail.com>
 <4925D713.8000505@sun.com> <49268022.9000107@day.com>
 <4926F534.9010105@sun.com> <492748EA.40305@sun.com>
In-Reply-To: <492748EA.40305@sun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

hi kenneth

please disregard my previous response.
actually the pom.xml contained outdated
dependencies.

that should be fixed at revision 720447.
regards
angela


> [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).
> 
> 
> Project ID: org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-test-client
> POM Location: /home/yue/jackrabbit/sandbox/spi/client/pom.xml
> Validation Messages:
> 
>     [0]  'dependencies.dependency.version' is missing for 
> org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-spi2jcr
> 
> 
> Reason: Failed to validate POM for project 
> org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-test-client at 
> /home/yue/jackrabbit/sandbox/spi/client/pom.xml
> 
> 
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Trace
> org.apache.maven.reactor.MavenExecutionException: Failed to validate POM 
> for project org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-test-client at 
> /home/yue/jackrabbit/sandbox/spi/client/pom.xml
>         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java:378)
>         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:292)
>         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:129)
>         at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:287)
>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>         at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) 
> 
>         at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) 
> 
>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
>         at 
> org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
>         at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
>         at 
> org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430) 
>      at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
> Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.InvalidProjectModelException: Failed 
> to validate POM for project org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-test-client 
> at /home/yue/jackrabbit/sandbox/spi/client/pom.xml
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.processProjectLogic(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:1108) 
> 
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:878) 
> 
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildFromSourceFileInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:506) 
> 
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.build(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:198) 
> 
>         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProject(DefaultMaven.java:583)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.collectProjects(DefaultMaven.java:461)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.collectProjects(DefaultMaven.java:534)
>         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java:365)
>         ... 11 more
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 3 seconds
> [INFO] Finished at: Fri Nov 21 15:39:40 PST 2008
> [INFO] Final Memory: 3M/249M
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Angela, I'll really appreciate if you have the working bits and just 
> kindly send them my way (email, put them on a FTP server, or whatever) 
> if you don't feel they're stable enough to commit.  I urgently need them 
> to continue my development.  Oh, by the way, throw in the 
> RepositoryFactory while you're at it so I don't have to read the test 
> code to figure out how to use those classes.  Thanks.
> 
> Ken
> 
>>> if, however, you think the spi2dav sandbox project
>>> should be put into a common release cycle, feel free to
>>> open an jira issue for that.
>>
>> Will do.
>>
>>>> I saw that too, but I don't want "to test the WebDAV remoting" as 
>>>> mentioned in the README; I want to use it. 
>>>
>>> fair enough. but currently it is in the sandbox, there
>>> is not automated testing installed and i can't promise
>>> you that everything works smoothly.
>>
>> That's fine.  I'm not doing anything fancy, just simply reading and 
>> writing attributes and node data (no versioning, no locking).  As long 
>> as the basic functionality works, I don't mind the code having some 
>> bugs here and there.
>>
>>> if you can live with that, feel free to use it.
>>> bug reports and requests for improvement are welcome.
>>>
>>>> [...] The ideal solution would be like 
>>>> org.apache.jackrabbit.rmi.client.ClientRepositoryFactory where I 
>>>> just configure it in my context.xml with the URL it needs and my 
>>>> code to lookup up the Repository object from JNDI doesn't need to 
>>>> change.  Does such RepositoryFactory exist?  
>>>
>>> at Day we are having a RepositoryFactory to obtain a jcr2spi
>>> Repository based on an extended version of the webdav
>>> remoting.
>>>
>>> i can put a similar factory for spi2dav to the sandbox,
>>> if you want me to. up to now this simply didn't have too
>>> much priority.
>>
>> YES, PLEASE, ASAP!  As I said above, it doesn't have to be perfectly 
>> stable/robust, as long as the basic best-case scenario works.
>>
>>> hope that helps
>>
>> Definitely.  Thanks again for your time.
>>
>> Ken
> 
>