jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kenneth Yue <Kenneth....@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [Fwd: Which RepositoryFactory for WebDAV?]
Date Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:48:58 GMT
Kenneth Yue wrote:
> Angela Schreiber wrote:
>>> That's what I'm trying to avoid.  Are they at least available on a 
>>> Maven repo somewhere?
>> hopefully not. sandbox projects are not released and i
>> would be surprised if someone you put a snapshot to
>> to a public available maven repo.
> OK, then, I'll just build them myself.

Too bad, I couldn't build them.  Here's what I got:

[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).

Project ID: org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-test-client
POM Location: /home/yue/jackrabbit/sandbox/spi/client/pom.xml
Validation Messages:

     [0]  'dependencies.dependency.version' is missing for 

Reason: Failed to validate POM for project 
org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-test-client at 

[INFO] Trace
org.apache.maven.reactor.MavenExecutionException: Failed to validate POM 
for project org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-test-client at 
         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java:378)
         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:292)
         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:129)
         at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:287)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
         at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
      at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.InvalidProjectModelException: Failed 
to validate POM for project org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-test-client 
at /home/yue/jackrabbit/sandbox/spi/client/pom.xml
         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProject(DefaultMaven.java:583)
         at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java:365)
         ... 11 more
[INFO] Total time: 3 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Nov 21 15:39:40 PST 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 3M/249M

Angela, I'll really appreciate if you have the working bits and just 
kindly send them my way (email, put them on a FTP server, or whatever) 
if you don't feel they're stable enough to commit.  I urgently need them 
to continue my development.  Oh, by the way, throw in the 
RepositoryFactory while you're at it so I don't have to read the test 
code to figure out how to use those classes.  Thanks.


>> if, however, you think the spi2dav sandbox project
>> should be put into a common release cycle, feel free to
>> open an jira issue for that.
> Will do.
>>> I saw that too, but I don't want "to test the WebDAV remoting" as 
>>> mentioned in the README; I want to use it. 
>> fair enough. but currently it is in the sandbox, there
>> is not automated testing installed and i can't promise
>> you that everything works smoothly.
> That's fine.  I'm not doing anything fancy, just simply reading and 
> writing attributes and node data (no versioning, no locking).  As long 
> as the basic functionality works, I don't mind the code having some bugs 
> here and there.
>> if you can live with that, feel free to use it.
>> bug reports and requests for improvement are welcome.
>>> [...] The ideal solution would be like 
>>> org.apache.jackrabbit.rmi.client.ClientRepositoryFactory where I just 
>>> configure it in my context.xml with the URL it needs and my code to 
>>> lookup up the Repository object from JNDI doesn't need to change.  
>>> Does such RepositoryFactory exist?  
>> at Day we are having a RepositoryFactory to obtain a jcr2spi
>> Repository based on an extended version of the webdav
>> remoting.
>> i can put a similar factory for spi2dav to the sandbox,
>> if you want me to. up to now this simply didn't have too
>> much priority.
> YES, PLEASE, ASAP!  As I said above, it doesn't have to be perfectly 
> stable/robust, as long as the basic best-case scenario works.
>> hope that helps
> Definitely.  Thanks again for your time.
> Ken

View raw message