Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 49563 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2008 23:31:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2008 23:31:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 80549 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2008 23:31:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 80535 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2008 23:31:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 80524 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2008 23:31:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:31:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.169.137.116] (HELO lpo-relay-05.vmsinfo.com) (216.169.137.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:30:01 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,341,1220241600"; d="xml'217?scan'217,208,217";a="13773335" Received: from unknown (HELO nyc-mailbox-02.vmsinfo.com) ([216.169.137.252]) by lpo-relay-05.vmsinfo.com with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2008 19:29:35 -0400 Received: from [10.1.1.14] (unknown [10.1.1.14]) by nyc-mailbox-02.vmsinfo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC1BBBEE for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:29:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <249BB1D4-D589-404B-8A39-51E58718562F@vmsinfo.com> From: Warner Onstine To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org In-Reply-To: <91f3b2650809292141v2e2054f8ycc7284b0ee7b2477@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Apple-Mail-4--302961841 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: clustering doesn't appear to be Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:29:33 -0700 References: <74EF8E28-75C2-4DA0-8577-E8861E6DD4AE@vmsinfo.com> <91f3b2650809292141v2e2054f8ycc7284b0ee7b2477@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-4--302961841 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No, they each have their own (configurable) node name. I'm attaching my repository.xml file for you. Thanks for the help, it's greatly appreciated. -warner --Apple-Mail-4--302961841 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=repository.xml Content-Type: text/xml; x-unix-mode=0644; name="repository.xml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Apple-Mail-4--302961841 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sep 29, 2008, at 9:41 PM, Thomas M=FCller wrote: > Hi, > > Could you check if the cluster ids are the same on both cluster nodes? > The cluster id is supposed to be unique. If this is not the problem, > could you post both repository.xml files? > > Regards, > Thomas > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Warner Onstine =20 > wrote: >> Wow, after a long wait, it finally showed up (after like 5 - 10 =20 >> minutes or >> more). Is there a config setting for this? I found the syncDelay, =20 >> but I'm >> not sure if this is the issue as it does detect the change (I'm =20 >> attributing >> this to the log files below) so I'm not sure what else I need to be =20= >> doing >> here. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -warner >> >> On Sep 29, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Warner Onstine wrote: >> >>> More weirdness, I rebooted both machines and now all the content I =20= >>> pushed >>> up to node 2 just disappeared. Only the stuff from node 1 still =20 >>> exists. >>> >>> -warner >>> >>> On Sep 29, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Warner Onstine wrote: >>> >>>> I really am not sure what is going on here as things appear to be =20= >>>> working >>>> (according to the logs), but unfortunately I can't see stuff from =20= >>>> one node >>>> to a different node. >>>> >>>> I have two machines setup, each with their own nodes. They are both >>>> connecting to the same db, and when I fired up the second node =20 >>>> everything >>>> seemed fine as the second node synced up with the first one. >>>> >>>> I then decided to mount this node (2) (I'm using WebDAV for my =20 >>>> interface >>>> so I'm mounting it that way). I pushed up some new files and in =20 >>>> the log >>>> files of both nodes I can see them syncing with each other. >>>> >>>> Node 2: >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:18,200 INFO [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1918 >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:18,592 INFO [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1919 >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:18,939 INFO [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1920 >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:23,230 INFO [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1923 >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:23,681 INFO [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1924 >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:24,017 INFO [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1925 >>>> >>>> >>>> Node 1: >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,464 INFO [AbstractJournal] Record with =20 >>>> revision >>>> '1917' created by this journal, skipped. >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,464 INFO [AbstractJournal] Record with =20 >>>> revision >>>> '1918' created by this journal, skipped. >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,464 INFO [AbstractJournal] Record with =20 >>>> revision >>>> '1919' created by this journal, skipped. >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,465 INFO [AbstractJournal] Record with =20 >>>> revision >>>> '1920' created by this journal, skipped. >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,465 INFO [AbstractJournal] Record with =20 >>>> revision >>>> '1921' created by this journal, skipped. >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,466 INFO [AbstractJournal] Synchronized to =20 >>>> revision: >>>> 1921 >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,471 INFO [AbstractJournal] Record with =20 >>>> revision >>>> '1922' created by this journal, skipped. >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,471 INFO [AbstractJournal] Record with =20 >>>> revision >>>> '1923' created by this journal, skipped. >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,471 INFO [AbstractJournal] Record with =20 >>>> revision >>>> '1924' created by this journal, skipped. >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,472 INFO [AbstractJournal] Record with =20 >>>> revision >>>> '1925' created by this journal, skipped. >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,472 INFO [AbstractJournal] Record with =20 >>>> revision >>>> '1926' created by this journal, skipped. >>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,473 INFO [AbstractJournal] Synchronized to =20 >>>> revision: >>>> 1926 >>>> >>>> But when I look at these two nodes separately one has the new =20 >>>> content and >>>> one doesn't. Curious, I added new content to node 1 and the same =20= >>>> behavior >>>> comes up where I can see the new content I just put up on node 1, =20= >>>> but not on >>>> node 2. >>>> >>>> Any ideas? This seems to be very odd behavior and I'm not sure if =20= >>>> it has >>>> something to do with WebDAV or not. >>>> >>>> -warner >>> >> >> --Apple-Mail-4--302961841--