jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thomas Müller" <thomas.muel...@day.com>
Subject Re: clustering doesn't appear to be
Date Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:41:28 GMT
Hi,

Could you check if the cluster ids are the same on both cluster nodes?
The cluster id is supposed to be unique. If this is not the problem,
could you post both repository.xml files?

Regards,
Thomas

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Warner Onstine <wonstine@vmsinfo.com> wrote:
> Wow, after a long wait, it finally showed up (after like 5 - 10 minutes or
> more). Is there a config setting for this? I found the syncDelay, but I'm
> not sure if this is the issue as it does detect the change (I'm attributing
> this to the log files below) so I'm not sure what else I need to be doing
> here.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -warner
>
> On Sep 29, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Warner Onstine wrote:
>
>> More weirdness, I rebooted both machines and now all the content I pushed
>> up to node 2 just disappeared. Only the stuff from node 1 still exists.
>>
>> -warner
>>
>> On Sep 29, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Warner Onstine wrote:
>>
>>> I really am not sure what is going on here as things appear to be working
>>> (according to the logs), but unfortunately I can't see stuff from one node
>>> to a different node.
>>>
>>> I have two machines setup, each with their own nodes. They are both
>>> connecting to the same db, and when I fired up the second node everything
>>> seemed fine as the second node synced up with the first one.
>>>
>>> I then decided to mount this node (2) (I'm using WebDAV for my interface
>>> so I'm mounting it that way). I pushed up some new files and in the log
>>> files of both nodes I can see them syncing with each other.
>>>
>>> Node 2:
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:18,200 INFO  [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1918
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:18,592 INFO  [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1919
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:18,939 INFO  [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1920
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:23,230 INFO  [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1923
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:23,681 INFO  [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1924
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:24,017 INFO  [ClusterNode] Appended revision: 1925
>>>
>>>
>>> Node 1:
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,464 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Record with revision
>>> '1917' created by this journal, skipped.
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,464 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Record with revision
>>> '1918' created by this journal, skipped.
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,464 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Record with revision
>>> '1919' created by this journal, skipped.
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,465 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Record with revision
>>> '1920' created by this journal, skipped.
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,465 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Record with revision
>>> '1921' created by this journal, skipped.
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:22,466 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Synchronized to revision:
>>> 1921
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,471 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Record with revision
>>> '1922' created by this journal, skipped.
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,471 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Record with revision
>>> '1923' created by this journal, skipped.
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,471 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Record with revision
>>> '1924' created by this journal, skipped.
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,472 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Record with revision
>>> '1925' created by this journal, skipped.
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,472 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Record with revision
>>> '1926' created by this journal, skipped.
>>> 2008-09-29 17:03:27,473 INFO  [AbstractJournal] Synchronized to revision:
>>> 1926
>>>
>>> But when I look at these two nodes separately one has the new content and
>>> one doesn't. Curious, I added new content to node 1 and the same behavior
>>> comes up where I can see the new content I just put up on node 1, but not on
>>> node 2.
>>>
>>> Any ideas? This seems to be very odd behavior and I'm not sure if it has
>>> something to do with WebDAV or not.
>>>
>>> -warner
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message