jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From S├ębastien Launay <sebastien.lau...@anyware-tech.com>
Subject Re: JackRabbit tables on MySql - MyISAM vs InnoDB
Date Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:51:53 GMT
Hi,

I totally agree that the engine must be included in the script,
this is why i created an improvement in JIRA a while ago.
Moreover MyISAM cannot be used in a cluster configuration
because there will be no lock on the journal tables and this
could produce multiple entries with the same revision number.

You can find a patch here:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1435

--
S├ębastien Launay

sbarriba wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The DDL for MySql doesn't specify MyISAM or InnoDB.
>
> As a result it uses the default table type which is usually MyISAM I
> believe.
>
>  
>
> Anyone have any issues / comments with using InnoDB instead with JackRabbit?
>
>  
>
> Regards,
>
> Shaun
>   

Mime
View raw message