jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fabián Mandelbaum <fmandelb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: David's Model and translation projects
Date Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:10:55 GMT
Hello Tobías, thanks for your answer.

Approach #2 is indeed, natural, however the "problem" I see with
approach #2 is that it seems to break David's rule #1 (data 1st vs.
structure 1st) by imposing a fixed content structure to projects (for
example, /common/ /en/ /fr/ /es/ /it/ etc.).

I'm not saying I won't end doing things this way (actually, it is so far
my personal choice), I just wanted to know if there was a way to do it
in a way that conforms a bit more to David's rule #1.

Thanks again.

Tobias Bocanegra escribió:
> hi,
> it certainly depends on your intention, but having a folder for each
> language is imo the best approach. you might have other resources
> later (like images) that are language dependent that you can put in
> the folder.
> regards, toby
> On 9/6/08, Fabián Mandelbaum <fmandelbaum@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello there,
>>     I'm considering David's Model
>>  (http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/DavidsModel) and was wondering how
>>  would David handle translations of documents.
>>     Let's say I have a file, for example: file.xml which is written in
>>  English, and I want to store its translation to, say, Spanish. Which
>>  would be the recommended storage model?
>>     1) Common storage place
>>     /content/file.xml (English version)
>>     /content/file-es.xml (Spanish version)
>>     /content/file-fr.xml (French version)
>>     2) Folders for each language
>>     /content/en/file.xml
>>     /content/es/file.xml
>>     /content/fr/file.xml
>>     3) Workspaces for each language
>>     /content/file.xml (in 'en' workspace)
>>     /content/file.xml (in 'es' workspace)
>>     /content/file.xml (in 'fr' workspace)
>>     Other? My ears are open, Thanks in advance.

View raw message