From users-return-8537-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Mon Aug 04 18:46:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 68511 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2008 18:46:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2008 18:46:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 37614 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2008 18:46:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 37593 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2008 18:46:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 37582 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2008 18:46:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:46:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tmueller@day.com designates 62.192.10.254 as permitted sender) Received: from [62.192.10.254] (HELO goobak01.day.com) (62.192.10.254) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:45:24 +0000 Received: by goobak01.day.com (Postfix, from userid 1212) id 00B675087F; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:44:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by goobak01.day.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9375750820 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:44:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1135270ywj.31 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.48.20 with SMTP id a20mr8748184ybk.127.1217875530883; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.54.21 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <91f3b2650808041145l5a306395q1e2a3e9eefc9d65b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:45:30 -0700 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_M=FCller?=" Sender: tmueller@day.com To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: BundleFsPersistenceManager & Transactions. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5a4137f498015235 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > I read an old post that mentioned that BundleFsPersistenceManager is not > transactional, is that still the case? See http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/PersistenceManagerFAQ specially "Consistency / Atomicy": "The current file based persistence managers are not always atomic. They do support transactions in Jackrabbit, the exception is after a crash: When the process is stopped while a transaction is being written to disk (power failure, process killed, Runtime.halt() called, VM crash), some data of a transaction may be committed and some not. Theoretically, some nodes may be corrupt (depending how and when the system crashed)..." > possible with BundleFsPersistenceManager? Yes, but if your system crashes you risk having a corrupt repository. Regards, Thomas