From users-return-8621-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Fri Aug 08 08:38:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 69910 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2008 08:38:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2008 08:38:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 60252 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2008 08:38:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 60230 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2008 08:38:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 60219 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2008 08:38:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:38:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcel.reutegger@gmx.net designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.165.64.20] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:37:28 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Aug 2008 08:36:54 -0000 Received: from l2tp.day.com (EHLO [192.168.10.9]) [62.192.10.243] by mail.gmx.net (mp050) with SMTP; 08 Aug 2008 10:36:54 +0200 X-Authenticated: #894343 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+IM7kIPQ6IU777CaxoKv11SbEiV5EnpYNuwls/rr GY6sKRtJ/cgwl6 Message-ID: <489C05A1.40104@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:36:49 +0200 From: Marcel Reutegger User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Dynamic Nodes References: <68db68230808070503n1fd0f5b2s876bd8df0fcb8158@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <68db68230808070503n1fd0f5b2s876bd8df0fcb8158@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.72 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Andrei, Andrei Latyshau wrote: > Hello, > We evaluate JackRabbit as store for business objects. Our business objects > has dynamic types, that means that user can add at any time new fields to > the objects. We need to search business objects by these dynamic fields. Is > JackRabbit good solution for such things using e.g. mixins? that's certainly possible, but you may also want to consider using a residual property definition or use nt:unstructured. > Is it possible > to run JackRabbit on Oracle to guarantee good perfomance and reliability on > 10-100 mio records? I've seen jackrabbit work well with about 10 million nodes. does anyone else have experience with larger repositories? regards marcel