jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Betty Chang" <bch...@edgenuity.com>
Subject Re: what does NodeTypeRegistry.reregisterNodeType() do?
Date Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:45:51 GMT
Hi -- Okay, it turns out I was doing something stupid, which is why it was 
not working.  I was going over stuff with a finer tooth
comb before filing a bug or looking at source, and I discovered my error.

I no longer have a problem if I just want to add a new property to a custom 
node.

I do notice that I cannot delete an existing one and add a new one, but that 
is okay.  We won't try to remove any properties.

Thanks for your help

Betty



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Angela Schreiber" <anchela@day.com>
To: <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: what does NodeTypeRegistry.reregisterNodeType() do?


> hi betty
>
>> What I ran is: 
>> http://yourhost:yourport/jackrabbit/server/default/jcr:root/jcr:system/jcr:nodeTypes/edge:file/jcr:propertyDefinition[n]/jcr:name

>> to look at all my custom properties, where n is the number of the custom 
>> property I added.
>> I can see all the properties I originally created, but whenever I add 
>> anything new to the CND file to
>> add an additional property to the same "edge:file" nodetype,  the newer 
>> properties never show up after I restart
>> Tomcat and run the URL.    In other words, I can only see the same number 
>> of properties I first had, and no new ones.
>
>> Is this possibly a bug?
>
> if there is neither exception nor warning in the log while
> reregistering the modified nodetypes... i would say so.
>
>> Should I just bite the bullet and look at the code for re-registering 
>> node types?
>
> that's up to you.
> in any case: could you report an issue with jackrabbit-core
> including a simple test-cnd (both originally and with the
> modification) that illustrates the problem and a step-by-step
> description of how you are able to reproduce the problem?
>
> thanks in advance
> angela
>
>> Betty
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Angela Schreiber" <anchela@day.com>
>> To: <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 11:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: what does NodeTypeRegistry.reregisterNodeType() do?
>>
>>
>>> hi
>>>
>>>> Yes, indeed,  I am saying that saying that the new *property 
>>>> definitions* are
>>>> not reflected  in the content representation of your nodetype
>>>> under /jcr:system/jcr:nodeTypes.
>>>>
>>>> I read this content representation on the client side.
>>>>
>>>> What does it mean to "refresh the tree"?
>>>
>>> i meant: Session.refresh(false) or 
>>> Session.getItem("/jcr:system/jcr:nodeTypes).refresh(false).
>>>
>>> in jcr2spi this forces the client to re-read the target
>>> item and all its subtree from the SPI.
>>>
>>>> I guess that the related question is, how do I know the re-registration 
>>>> was successful?
>>>
>>> basically i would expect the NodeTypeRegistry to throw,
>>> if re-registering a node type is not successful... but
>>> it seems this is not the case here. right?
>>>
>>>> I have an idea -- should I try dumping out the /jcr:system  tree on the 
>>>> server side right after re-registration to see what I get?
>>>
>>> if that is feasible, please do so. if your are - just by
>>> coincidence - running the jackrabbit webapp on the
>>> server-side, you can easily do so in a browser:
>>>
>>> http://yourhost:yourport/jackrabbit/server/default/jcr:root/jcr:system/jcr:nodeTypes/nt:file
>>> > replace 'nt:file' by your nt name
>>> > 'jackrabbit', 'server' and 'default' may be different in your
>>>   installation if you change the defaults.''
>>>
>>> if
>>> - the property definition is still the old on the server side
>>>   i assume that for whatever reason the reregistration was
>>>   no successful. could ev. be a bug in core.
>>>
>>> - the property definition is as expected on the server side
>>>   and is not reflect on the client even upon Session.refresh...
>>>   then i have to try it myself ;)
>>>
>>> please post your findings.
>>> could you also send the original nodetype definition and the
>>> changes you want to make? sometimes things get easier, if we
>>> can take a closer look at it or try it out. currently i am
>>> only guessing.
>>>
>>> angela
>>>
>>
>>
>
> 


Mime
View raw message