Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcel.reutegger@gmx.net
 designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <488443C3.3070109@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:07:31 +0200
From: Marcel Reutegger <marcel.reutegger@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: newb transient repository questions
References: <82670ba40807180622j600c5461mf4bf311a67f241ec@mail.gmail.com>
  <c3ac3bad0807180733g30e7638frcf18aed9cc12a15b@mail.gmail.com>
  <82670ba40807180740o42a75384m21d303c35ce54c03@mail.gmail.com>
 <82670ba40807180759l69c8e763g398d10f8399088b8@mail.gmail.com>
 <488435BC.3060108@gmx.net> <11910710527.20080721092059@holeczek.de>
In-Reply-To: <11910710527.20080721092059@holeczek.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Florian,

ah, of course, you are right.

Michael, can you tell us what nodes remain in the workspace after you removed 
the assets node and called save?

regards
  marcel

Florian Holeczek wrote:
> Hallo Marcel,
> 
> are you sure about this? I thought Michael's code produced the
> following tree:
> 
>       root
>        |
>      assets
>     /      \
> asset[1] asset[2]
> 
> Regards,
>  Florian
> 
> Urspr�ngliche Nachricht vom 21.07.2008 um 09:07:
>> Hi Michael,
> 
>> Michael Harris wrote:
>>> another noob question.  I have the following codes
>>>
>>>                 Node root = session.getRootNode();
>>>                 Node assets = root.addNode("assets");
>>>
>>>                 // Store content
>>>                 Node asset = assets.addNode("asset");
>>>                 asset.setProperty("url", "http://asset1url.org");
>>>                 asset.setProperty("name", "Asset 1");
>>>                 asset.setProperty("typetype", "image");
>>>
>>>                 Node asset2 = assets.addNode("asset");
> 
>> this creates a same named sibling /asset[2]
> 
>>>                 asset2.setProperty("url", "http://asset2url.org");
>>>                 asset2.setProperty("name", "Asset 2");
>>>                 asset2.setProperty("type", "image");
>>>                 session.save();
>>>
>>> and then
>>>
>>>         Node root = session.getRootNode();
>>>         Node assets = root.getNode("assets");
> 
>> this will only return the first asset node but not the second one.
> 
>>>         assets.remove();
>>>         session.save();
>>>
>>> the more I run the test, the more nodes I get.  Seems like the data in the
>>> TransientRepo is being stored on the disk.  The remove is not cleaning it
>>> up.  For why?
> 
>> to remove all asset nodes you need to do the following:
> 
>> for (NodeIterator assets = root.getNodes("assets"); assets.hasNext(); ) {
>>      assets.nextNode().remove();
>> }
>> session.save();
> 
>> regards
>>   marcel
>