Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 47826 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2008 14:58:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2008 14:58:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 32179 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2008 14:58:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 31716 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2008 14:58:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 31705 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2008 14:58:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:58:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [12.164.136.139] (HELO ns2.unicon.net) (12.164.136.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:57:09 +0000 Received: from saber.unicon.net (mailduit [12.164.148.152]) by ns2.unicon.net (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id HAA22974 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:57:29 -0700 (MST) Received: from zimbra.unicon.net (zimbra.unicon.net [::ffff:12.164.148.145]) by saber.unicon.net with esmtp; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:57:29 -0700 id 001FB851.486CE8D9.00002438 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.unicon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D301588002 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:57:29 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Score: -1.829 X-Spam-Level: Received: from zimbra.unicon.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.unicon.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ffMxw4SccmIv for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:57:24 -0700 (MST) Received: from zimbra.unicon.net (zimbra.unicon.net [12.164.148.145]) by zimbra.unicon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28E61588001 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:57:24 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:57:24 -0700 (MST) From: Lennard Fuller To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Message-ID: <20633204.132191215097044665.JavaMail.root@zimbra.unicon.net> In-Reply-To: <18260175.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: jcr2spi<->spi-rmi<->spi2jcr<->jackrabbit-core config? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [68.98.56.21] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Flag: NO X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.829 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[AWL=-0.729, BAYES_00=-2.599, WHOIS_MYPRIVREG=1.499] Thanks! Hopefully I'll have a chance to give this a spin today. If I come across anything interesting or noteworthy concerning the set up I'll send it Scott's way for possible inclusion in the wiki. If this method proves to be notably more performant, even in its unoptimized state, I'll post those findings to the mailing list. Thanks again for your timely responses, Lennard ----- Original Message ----- From: "scytacki" To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 7:44:16 AM GMT -07:00 U.S. Mountain Time (Arizona) Subject: Re: jcr2spi<->spi-rmi<->spi2jcr<->jackrabbit-core config? I created this page which documents how I set things up: http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/HowtoSpi2Rmi Angela, I added your comments to that page. lennard wrote: > > I happened across Jukka Zitting's web page in which he announced some of > the new features in Jackrabbit 1.4. In particular, this paragraph was of > interest. > > "Service provider interface for JCR. The jackrabbit-spi component defines > an architectural layer below the JCR API. The SPI layer is designed > specifically for remote access and outlines a way for us to avoid the > performance limitations of JCR-RMI that works on top of JCR." > > This is because I have JCR client applications which are currently > accessing the JCR via JCR-RMI. With a significant amount of client side > caching the performance is acceptable for our current usage... but only > just. The prospect of accessing the JCR external to that JCR's JVM in a > reasonably performant fashion is very exciting. > > Looking at the mailing list I can see references to a method of getting > remote access to a JCR using SPI and RMI. > > Marcel mentioned the following alternative: > jcr2spi<->spi-rmi<->spi2jcr<->jackrabbit-core > > Thus far I have been unable to find any How to, Readme or wiki page which > covers this particular configuration. Can someone point me in the right > direction? Is there another configuration I should consider first? > > Lennard Fuller > Software Architect > Unicon Inc. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jcr2spi%3C-%3Espi-rmi%3C-%3Espi2jcr%3C-%3Ejackrabbit-core-config--tp18248099p18260175.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.