Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <17539739.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: munguia <diego.munguia@rbxglobal.com>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Applications' db and jackrabbit db should 'em be the same?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hi,

I'm designing a new application that will use jackrabbit on the backend, I'm
planning to use the db persistence manager for jackrabbit and the
application will have it's own database as well. Both of them will be on
Postgres ... My question is, given the inner workings of the persistence
manager, is it recommended to have both the app's db and jcr's db on the
same schema (the pro that I'm seeing here for this is the simplicity of
backups) or is it better to have them on separated dbs/schemas?

Thanks.
Diego
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Applications%27-db-and-jackrabbit-db-should-%27em-be-the-same--tp17539739p17539739.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.