Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Subject: Re: Other 3rd party libraries in Jackrabbit's war file
From: Paco Avila <pavila@git.es>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <7E800275DDC940E1AF521E660BF1233C@minbar>
References: <7E800275DDC940E1AF521E660BF1233C@minbar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Organization: GIT Consultors
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 09:52:11 +0200
Message-Id: <1209973931.6312.4.camel@monkiki.git.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Yes, ﻿pdfbox 0.7.3 is much better than the default Jackrabbit version. I
have been testing POI 3.0.2 and failed to extract text from some Excel
files which was done whithout problems with POI 3.0.1.

El jue, 01-05-2008 a las 14:39 -0700, Julio Castillo escribió:
> Thought I share this with you all and save you some time.
> 
> Because we use a good number of open source libraries, I had to test
> Jackrabbit (to the degree that I use it) with newer versions of other
> libraries that are embedded in the jackrabbit war file. 
> 
> I successfully deployed and ran with the following upgrades. 
> 
> - slf4j 1.5.0 
> - commons-codec 1.3 
> - commons-collections 3.2 
> - commons-httpclient 3.1 
> - junit 4.4 
> - log4j 1.2.15 
> - xerces 2.9.1 
> - pdfbox 0.7.3 that should include new dependency on fontbox 0.1 (See bug#
> 1567) 
> - POI 3.0.2 
> 
> Couldn't upgrade the tm-extractors (see bug# 1568)
> 
> Julio Castillo
> Edgenuity Inc.
> 
-- 
Paco Avila <pavila@git.es>
GIT Consultors