jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefan Guggisberg" <stefan.guggisb...@day.com>
Subject Re: Applications' db and jackrabbit db should 'em be the same?
Date Fri, 30 May 2008 08:54:23 GMT
hi diego

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:23 PM, munguia <diego.munguia@rbxglobal.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm designing a new application that will use jackrabbit on the backend, I'm
> planning to use the db persistence manager for jackrabbit and the
> application will have it's own database as well. Both of them will be on
> Postgres ... My question is, given the inner workings of the persistence
> manager, is it recommended to have both the app's db and jcr's db on the
> same schema (the pro that I'm seeing here for this is the simplicity of
> backups) or is it better to have them on separated dbs/schemas?

i don't see any problems with using a shared schema for your app and
jackrabbit data.

cheers
stefan

>
> Thanks.
> Diego
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Applications%27-db-and-jackrabbit-db-should-%27em-be-the-same--tp17539739p17539739.html
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
View raw message