Return-Path: 
 <users-return-6927-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org
Received: (qmail 46968 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2008 12:22:55 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2008 12:22:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 18855 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2008 12:22:53 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18840 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2008 12:22:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.jackrabbit.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18831 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2008 12:22:53 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:22:53 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [207.97.245.165] (HELO smtp165.iad.emailsrvr.com)
 (207.97.245.165)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:22:13 +0000
Received: from relay6.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by relay6.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 20A3C72C5A1;
	Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:22:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by relay6.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender:
 dbrosius-AT-baybroadband.net) with ESMTP id E3F2972C1DB;
	Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:22:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <004101c89332$48d38a10$6501a8c0@MeBigFatGuy>
From: "Dave Brosius" <dbrosius@mebigfatguy.com>
To: <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>,
	<cj@proteanit.net>
References: <47EFE756.5060500@proteanit.net>
 <d8ffccc20803310436o10796801k4e84aec30545082c@mail.gmail.com>
 <47F0D501.6070201@proteanit.net>
Subject: Re: Node unfound, Node unsaved
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:22:35 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Charles,

    Take a look at Node Type Definitions. I think this is really what you 
want, NTDs are kind of like xml schemas, so you get the 'type safety' of 
knowing that a child of 'reviews' is really a thing you know of as being a 
review. But with the benefit of having it's own name.

See

http://jackrabbit.apache.org/node-types.html


cheers,
dave

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Johnson" <cj@proteanit.net>
To: <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: Node unfound, Node unsaved


> Thanks Greg, i'll have a look at that. I don't know if things should be
> different with JCR, but i was just proceeding on the standard xml:
>
> <reviews>
>    <review isbn="xxxx">bar</review>
>    <review isbn="yyyy">foo</review>
> </reviews>
>
> CJ
>
> Greg Klebus wrote:
>> Hi Charles
>>
>> Just a short comment on your content model:
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Charles Johnson <cj@proteanit.net> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  There seem to be problems with the most fundamental functionality. I'm
>>>  trying to create a single Node, /reviews, which I'll later use as the
>>>  root for /reviews/review[0..n]
>>>
>>
>> Is there a reason for using same-name-siblings here? I think something
>> like that would be much easier to handle, and much more
>> self-explanatory:
>>
>> /reviews/review-iphone
>> /reviews/review-ipodnano
>>
>> or sth similar (depending on what's review subject).
>>
>> Have you seen David's Model, esp Rule #4: Beware of Same Name Siblings
>> [1]? You might disagree, but should at least consider the consequences
>> of using SNSs.
>>
>> [1] 
>> http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/DavidsModel#head-1df0224190c265f5156f037eb3f20e314fa6c4a7
>>
>> Cheers
>> Greg
>>
>> PS. Sorry if that's a well thought-through decision already :)
>>
>>
>
>