jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Corné A" <tri...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Multiple PersistenceManagers
Date Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:57:36 GMT
Thanks for your reply Thomas,

And indeed I read the FAQ's and Wiki but I don't really get the
concept of 'Atomic' and multiple Perisistance.

Some wild grasp; couldn't I use 2 'Workspaces'  with differrent
PersistenceManager?

Corné

2008/3/10, Thomas Mueller
> Hi,
>
>  I'm not sure if you have read:
>  http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/PersistenceManagerFAQ
>  specially 'Consistency / Atomicy'
>
>
>  > So is it possible to maintain 2 PersistenceManagers
>
>
> You could write a 'DualPersistenceManager' that stores everything in
>  both PMs but only reads from one. I did that once; the problem is
>  configuration (how to configure both at the same time).
>
>  Regards,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>  On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Corné A <tricae@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  >   We have a dispute amongst our developers and can't decide on wich
>  >   PersistenceManager to use on a run a linux 10 box.
>  >
>  >   some are in favor of a Database PM
>  >   (org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.bundle.MySqlPersistenceManager)
>  >   and some for the File-System PM.
>  >
>  >   Main arguments concern performance and backup.
>  >
>  >   Since I think just using both in real-life will resolve the issue.
>  >   So is it possible to maintain 2 PersistenceManagers so we can still
>  >   make a switch.
>  >
>  >   Thanks
>  >   Corné
>  >
>

Mime
View raw message