Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 58898 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2007 16:23:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2007 16:23:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 37749 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2007 16:23:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 37581 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2007 16:23:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 37572 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2007 16:23:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:23:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mwaschkowski@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.228] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:23:24 +0000 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so719069nze for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=qip7u2VhjVBc/LEaEJfGnCGmdWmVPLFoDc8OyXBuGnw=; b=puwygaKFYOi1MIwcm8hOzVP0QZjavuHa/QmY9NOzhCLRv9AUPLbrHrqv8HcA0Wun84WuW8lFrkUs3tCIzW+/+wtHZ8tlUpmoev+5xd/tNo96YrdPXTnnTKIXs+iKrPw0ccH1peeVnlrhJjCRYTXYZeo00ZMkv3cmFaLe0/P9lF0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=a3ToVpRLQTFRPKE7bhbEcMzPXlDXPO1p2ywiVOaYSTvnVrdatYsBIgUuxf0lKdr7FnwEegwQo/E7TJgBjvujcmE6vawJXC6eRYoo1ZiNM5mGDjtMXkv5Ye0u28qFcf1TEcgzvqdqEdhK5fYZyxGSgaie/JtW/NR2DFsfnPd1KqM= Received: by 10.64.242.5 with SMTP id p5mr2157229qbh.1190391783635; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.145.11 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <76a6ebd00709210923m2b3b2429qe9fdcf596e19b08c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:23:03 -0400 From: "Mark Waschkowski" To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: column specifier MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_34425_8335394.1190391783621" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_34425_8335394.1190391783621 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I am having some difficulty with column specifiers and, surprisingly, didn't see any previous mention of it in the mailing list yet. On p.98 and 99 of the spec, it discusses column specifiers (which filter results showing only the columns the user is interested in) and states: " Support is only required for single-value, non-residual properties that are declared in or inherited by the node types specified in the type constraint. It is optional to allow specification of residual properties as columns. " My understanding of this is that column specifiers can only be used for properties of a node that have been declared using custom node types? Is that correct? If so, I'm curious about why of this choice? Is it somehow performance/indexing related ? Cheers, Mark ------=_Part_34425_8335394.1190391783621--