From users-return-4872-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Fri Sep 07 14:25:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 35394 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2007 14:25:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2007 14:25:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 87755 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2007 14:24:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 87741 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2007 14:24:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 87732 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2007 14:24:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 07:24:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of harvey.waters@googlemail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.190] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:24:54 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 30so398697nfu for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 07:24:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=+dsG1wWp9HYpim0Pm6qrwe2ELqNvx1xJPV3KeuIhubg=; b=iOJNxmxo8+TdPRNSSmhFrCMDnM92hH0WQT/IziRGCwMWCRhU7jpjeXSNZ0zog7xv0EwgMaChAe+SYM7znqccDtaHOKl/BKcy9opwMMJTNYLTSZ0o8OCpoEq4f7psywGTPQJ4p/c5w3Ot/vfqv2w/jgiZpCmlRlYlrGGq4PTg68c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=As9HmbHOAhJiRrAruCFqStCNJqfz6GtcoRgLQ647Ct0z9tY9sC8KC0YQ0G3wFxPMUFs6F/6ft8Ml7PwwAyuaXaFzQp2ZqFohk6FRG590V/3lOri86CC2Fvf4WceXLG3+pkogCfyi2Y6X8gOi9I8gaX+e9qnm2QY9fTEZXFNAoCU= Received: by 10.86.57.9 with SMTP id f9mr1467393fga.1189175073429; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 07:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.77.15 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 07:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <235bf4ca0709070724x37424326y499485f92ff61758@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:24:33 +0100 From: "harvey waters" To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Bundled PM tmp files filling up tomcat In-Reply-To: <5f211bd50709070659j1008573doe59848e757fbaa27@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3494_6906440.1189175073418" References: <235bf4ca0709070429m3a95e327k3a84df85b1881c29@mail.gmail.com> <5f211bd50709070437s7cd3a907ub4cdead2e17e7d96@mail.gmail.com> <235bf4ca0709070634u678f2b3cpbfd15d8b91c3570f@mail.gmail.com> <5f211bd50709070659j1008573doe59848e757fbaa27@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_3494_6906440.1189175073418 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline OK I'll see if I can replicate in a seperate test case. I guess that'll also allow me to see if its my stuff thats gone wrong. Will the datastore replace these tem binaries in the long term anyway ? On 9/7/07, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry, I don't think I can help you, I don't know enough about the > mechanism. Maybe all temp files older than a day could be removed? > > If you have a simple standalone test case that inserts one blob so > that multiple duplicate temp files are created, please log a bug. > Solving the problem will be very hard without test case... > > I'm currently working on DataStore, where creating temporary files is > avoided (in most cases). But this is not available for version 1.3 of > Jackrabbit... > > Thomas > > > > On 9/7/07, harvey waters wrote: > > No sorry I don't have a test case. I just got a 'Disk Full' error on our > > live server and then took a look in the tomcat temp directory and found > all > > the binaries going back to when we installed the system. I thought these > > binaries were used as a BLOB cache for JackRabbit, if so I guessed there > > might be a way of managing them. > > > > Currently we're on version 1.3 of JackRabbit. > > > > On 9/7/07, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > What version did you use, and do you have a simple test case? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Thomas > > > > > > On 9/7/07, harvey waters wrote: > > > > Is there anyway I can stop the bundled PM from filling up the temp > > > directory > > > > in Tomcat. I aslo noticed that on loading a binary into JackRabbit I > > > ended > > > > up with 9 duplicated tmp files. Have I done soemthing wrong here or > is > > > it > > > > JackRabbit ? > > > > > > > > Many Thanks > > > > > > > > Harvery > > > > > > > > > > ------=_Part_3494_6906440.1189175073418--