jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ard Schrijvers" <a.schrijv...@hippo.nl>
Subject RE: WebDAV component usage example
Date Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:01:24 GMT
The Jakarta Slide list is kind of dorming (trying to be subtle) if you ask me. I read this
jira issue the other day [1], about somebody implementing WebDav layer for Hadoop [2]. Think
you need something similar, and results were that he used the JR webdav block/APIs

Enis Soztutar:
"Slide seems good enough at first, but it depends on lots of other libraries, it is poorly
documented(at least for a newcomer like myself), and i think the development slowed down after

I think you might want to take a look at [2] for the attachments

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-496
[2] http://lucene.apache.org/hadoop/

Regards Ard

Darren Hartford wrote: 
If you don't want Jackrabbit, I would recommend getting on the Jakarta
Slide list instead for WebDAV.

Otherwise, yes the WebDAV servlet would be where you would need to

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eugeny N Dzhurinsky [mailto:bofh@redwerk.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 10:33 AM
> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: WebDAV component usage example
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:12:21AM -0400, Darren Hartford wrote:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/JackRabbitOnTomcat
> > http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/JackrabbitOnJBoss
> > 
> > Should be able to get the Jackrabbit Webapp WAR that you 
> can just drop 
> > into place from the downloads section:
> > http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.cgi
> > 
> > The WebDAV component is just a servlet that talks to the Jackrabbit 
> > Repository.
> The thing is I don't need to talk to JackRabbit's repository, 
> I need to intercept WebDAV requests and pass them to custom 
> storage, some kind of adapter, in examined sources of 
> SimpleWebdavServlet and found it is possible to provide 
> custom ResourceFactory to the servlet, which seem to deal 
> with repository, and I guess this is extension point where I 
> could plug my own implementation of the factory, which deals 
> with custom repository? Am I on the right way?
> --
> Eugene N Dzhurinsky

  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message