Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 14638 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2007 10:01:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2007 10:01:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 55871 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2007 10:01:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 55702 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2007 10:01:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 55693 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2007 10:01:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:01:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of antongavazuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.244 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.244] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:01:15 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c37so148781anc for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:00:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=G2pMb/mjy+dLKp0a3QCEBGOcsNuGYdFj0+vb01RxufHBMFrRqETcNzjAh/thTCBCPG83rr3jkXDhua70KCsHn3HbYjeB7SKJdegPeOtRMH02b/FrILCU1VZdWQ1kggmwHGkCwc0hL1Kgy5SfOnPVcIaHHRvDsuCiLduSO+MxN1k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=O47XfOfj6JifIZTMGpPPq6a39W+YXih6qxeefouEPqPwZ6aHsTXhvXWvjrTiJd1qLHMD91G9tw9yTQUJGrLi97TdQxHNDEwJytKV+iaEjFJ98AOH7cYcVF9DDsF61B6gtCb6stotxouveVeEPDM4U2HOQXFfU5VVTkFzAEEd9lY= Received: by 10.100.107.2 with SMTP id f2mr2003807anc.1186740054669; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.144.20 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:00:54 +0300 From: "Anton Gavazuk" To: "Jackrabbit users" Subject: Optimal structure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_16251_19537169.1186740054647" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_16251_19537169.1186740054647 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello all! I have the question about optimal structure of repository root nodeTypeA ... nodeTypeB ... nodeTypeC or root rootForA nodeTypeA ... rootForB nodeTypeB ... rootForC nodeTypeC ... Is there anything which can impact on prefomance or on maintainability? ------=_Part_16251_19537169.1186740054647--