Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.128.191 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=LIyXIKpblNn5UJCn14AvH5RHWZR1QCVjNAbFHD19AxD28zezVHUJ2PM8+lzXW2iONs1VFV2wR4JPUpfEb4SO1MN3krEFB321L6ToIyGbllth1GvMfVA7gINJojKM07XsJxAWkHjg/8eKUiy0RvExggNSgNBQqtWqdv3np0b1V/Y=
Message-ID: <90a8d1c00708100225x46b3ebferaaae5a5510a1f13d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:25:17 +0200
From: "Stefan Guggisberg" <stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: JackRabbit Relationships and Efficiency
In-Reply-To: <12087895.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <12087895.post@talk.nabble.com>

hi phil

On 8/10/07, woolly <p.barr@lbs-ltd.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Having set up JackRabbit and pointed it at an Oracle instance for it to use
> as the filesystem, i've looked at the schema and it appears that there are
> no relationships between any of the tables.
>
> Surely this is inefficient? Won't there be a performance hit for this?

why?

cheers
stefan

>
> Phil.
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JackRabbit-Relationships-and-Efficiency-tf4247534.html#a12087895
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>