jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefan Guggisberg" <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JackRabbit Relationships and Efficiency
Date Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:42:15 GMT
On 8/10/07, woolly <p.barr@lbs-ltd.com> wrote:
>
> i thought that databases optimised lookups based on the defined
> relationships. is this not the case?
>
> also, what about data integrity? are we relying on JackRabbit to manage that
> for us? but if so, surely it would want some help from the db?
>
> it just seems to be a very "strange" schema.....

aha? i would agree that it is a very simple schema, it contains just
one table, i.e. FS_ENTRY ;-).

>
>
>
> Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
> >
> > hi phil
> >
> > On 8/10/07, woolly <p.barr@lbs-ltd.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Having set up JackRabbit and pointed it at an Oracle instance for it to
> >> use
> >> as the filesystem, i've looked at the schema and it appears that there
> >> are
> >> no relationships between any of the tables.
> >>
> >> Surely this is inefficient? Won't there be a performance hit for this?
> >
> > why?
> >
> > cheers
> > stefan
> >
> >>
> >> Phil.
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/JackRabbit-Relationships-and-Efficiency-tf4247534.html#a12087895
> >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JackRabbit-Relationships-and-Efficiency-tf4247534.html#a12088214
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
View raw message