jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thomas Mueller" <thomas.tom.muel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Removing Items
Date Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:05:55 GMT
> JCR ... defines the property names (columns) for every node (record) in the system.

That's an implementation issue, not a API issue. At the moment
Jackrabbit does store the property names for each row. However other
JCR implementations do not, and Jackrabbit could be changed as well.

> I do have situations when I need that property
> (regardless of the value)

I do not. But:

1) There are many situations where data needs to be reviewed.  This
could be solved by extending the JCR API like this:
- void Property.setReviewed(String reviewer, Calendar date).
- boolean Property.isReviewed()
- String Property.getReviewer()
- Calendar Property.getReviewedDate()

2) What about having a create date and modified date for each node?

3) What about storing the language for each String:
Value ValueFactory.createValue(String value, String language);
String Value.getLanguage();

4) What about supporting two type of NULL: 'Missing But Applicable'
and 'Missing But Inapplicable' (as suggested by Dr. Codd)

Do you understand what I mean with this?

I think the idea of an API is to support what really is required, and
not be too complex. About the complexity of NULL in SQL, I suggest to
read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_%28SQL%29

> Comparing to SQL, if you set the value of column of a row to
> null, the value is null, but you don't lose the column.

Again, there is no other way in SQL to say that the data is not known
for a column. In JCR, there is (removing the property). So JCR already
supports NULL. No need to support it in two slightly different ways.

> NOT at all similar to the way Java itself operates.

Java is a programming language, JCR is a persistence layer.


View raw message