jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: 3.1.3.1 Removing Items
Date Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:17:05 GMT
OK,

sorry for the confusion.

What I *should* have said is that we shouldn't discuss the definition of 
setValue/SetProperty(null), but Section 3.7.3 ("No Null Values"), which 
is part of Section 3, "The Repository Model" (sic).

Best regards, Julian

Mark Waschkowski wrote:
> "If you want to discuss a data model change, please be clear about it,
> and stop discussing the API. What the API does depends on the data
> model, not the other way around."
> 
> I think we've had this discussion in another thread already...
> 
> Anyway, I'm discussing the API. JCR is an API, not an implementation. Please
> see:
>   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSR-170
> "*Content Repository API for Java* (*JCR*) is a specification for a Java
> platform <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_platform>
> API<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_Programming_Interface>for
> accessing content
> repositories<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Content_repository&action=edit>in
> a uniform manner. "
> 
> I don't care that there are 800+ implementations out there already for
> content repository or the data models that each of the those implementations
> uses. I'm sure that consideration was made for the implementations that
> existed prior to the spec, but I'm also sure that not every one of those
> implementations could easily accommodate conforming to the spec, and thats
> why different levels were introduced.
> 
> In any case, its the mandated behavior of the new spec that I'm trying my
> best to provide feedback on, which I'm actually hoping may improve it.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mark

Mime
View raw message