Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 63138 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2007 09:10:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2007 09:10:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 44937 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2007 09:09:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 44921 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2007 09:09:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 44912 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2007 09:09:42 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:09:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.226] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:09:40 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so728462nze for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:09:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pR6kYga/CpP3LIJJ0K5ibAuz+9Jpnid5zyXbpI95xaZ1dHS0APV2+zmrYk5pJmLmHLcMvXz0RIKIWgJLTTApPlw3mC1Q39qtbvDHEWmvTWhXqI3jmOkps4f9ZYwCqc4kPu+Q6+8hK0Epb7XtlX+wEutQmyhAYMiZS+vEMpfwa9k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FGjaWqy7bYn/c9cPRdDFpUU9hSv/DThi0x1g9OyDMXZQvbgrpi8ncJ8Hiu5uq4zIRiToNPi/nAdh64An9bSwpqHpuMLluHWKT51kc4Wez44QsjMc3wMyrCpPYe/k8dzheUaRRMur+fEraajrADoJoh9hOruH01qQQPk6WkhHOzg= Received: by 10.115.75.1 with SMTP id c1mr264684wal.1184922558944; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.150.12 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:09:18 +0300 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Alexandru_Popescu_=E2=98=80?=" To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Isolation level inconsistency. In-Reply-To: <510143ac0707200203v435b4b0bj41791c45e27ddca0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070719232038.3D1BB10FB051@herse.apache.org> <46A00365.9000600@yourmail.com> <90a8d1c00707200156t76a15df2u2517747c65b351f4@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0707200203v435b4b0bj41791c45e27ddca0@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 7/20/07, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On 7/20/07, Stefan Guggisberg wrote: > > AFAIK databases simply don't support the concept of transient changes. > > please note that the JCR save() is not the equivalent of a db commit(). > > Well said! A better analogue, as already mentoned, is Statement.execute(). > Hope you will not get angry on me :-), but an uncommitted change is a transient change, so I do think RDBMS are using the transient concept. bests, ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >