Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 50418 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2007 09:43:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2007 09:43:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 25736 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2007 09:43:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 25558 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2007 09:43:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 25548 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2007 09:43:28 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:43:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of harvey.waters@googlemail.com designates 66.249.92.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.173] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:43:24 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so292173ugf for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:43:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=QLO75HfxMEm+Up+Y6/25UBqyv8w2+DqO8XhejJgCh/zaA++Z5FV1+N/BzdbLO2x/BFRn4T7L+Ex+kcs7ASpnNNP7V/0t8G1OIknu3F2twVSwKHvVLhuGD7mmYz+ukI1qxJV2tnvHvtzSI+DW3Db1TWWz5nWJAygRbYlmr49wJCc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=K5RYkVHBeCTEGS11hpa3ijWw1e6YaBQ+9LCVX0ZwWW6E+vQw1b82iYhrTshtNqkgH+eUQmtbE6u5f0B27IG0cw0x3og5JdW+306vVxKKNDPpbDe/OHjzn//2Nx7NNpfSYntpzkPrfLqitJsQIEG1iU4SSa6JreI0SJvS7ezZMeM= Received: by 10.78.204.1 with SMTP id b1mr3997051hug.1183542183319; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.196.3 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 02:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <235bf4ca0707040243qaf35e23i79d2861125c8acd1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:43:03 +0100 From: "harvey waters" To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Audit Trail In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_52591_26242311.1183542183298" References: <235bf4ca0707040200u2be04d80g916f6c609eaccc00@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_52591_26242311.1183542183298 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline We decided against it initially because the data is very simple and would't require the overheads of versioning, security checking etc. On 7/4/07, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > On 7/4/07, harvey waters wrote: > > We're trying to implement an audit trail of activity, (who's adding > content, > > deleting e.t.c). Our first thought was to record the activity in a > seperate > > database but this means using distributed transactions.... > > Why not record the audit trail info in the repository? > > I'm doing this in one of our apps, using a separate tree which stores > audit trail events under paths like > > /audittrail/2007/20070530/event-1 > > It works well for me, and avoids the use of a different storage mechanism. > > -Bertrand > ------=_Part_52591_26242311.1183542183298--