jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ard Schrijvers" <a.schrijv...@hippo.nl>
Subject RE: question regarding jackrabbit index implementation
Date Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:54:41 GMT
Hello,

> >
> > :-(
> 
> currently, a lot of people, incl. jackrabbit committers, are on summer
> vacation.
> you should take that into account when expecting replies.

yes I was already expecting this...think I should have summer holiday as well :-) 



> 
> cheers
> stefan.
> 
> >
> > Regards Ard
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have been looking at the
> > > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene implementation, and I
> > > do not understand what the reason(s) for multiple persistent
> > > indices has been (for one single workspace)?
> > >
> > > I do understand the choice for a VolatileIndex and a
> > > PersistentIndex obviously, but I just can't get a grip on why
> > > multiple persistent indices are created, and the lucene
> > > segment similar merging algorithms are done on multiple
> > > persistent indices? Is it done for performance technical reasons?
> > >
> > > Can somebody enlight me on the reasons and benefits of the
> > > multiple Persistent indices per workspace (I am ofcourse sure
> > > there are good reasons, but I just can't seem to be able to
> > > grasp it yet :-) )?
> > >
> > > thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > Regards Ard
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Hippo
> > > Oosteinde 11
> > > 1017WT Amsterdam
> > > The Netherlands
> > > Tel  +31 (0)20 5224466
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > a.schrijvers@hippo.nl / ard@apache.org / http://www.hippo.nl
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message