jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tako Schotanus" <quinte...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Removing Items
Date Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:47:54 GMT
On 7/24/07, IvanLatysh <ivan@yourmail.com> wrote:
> Tako Schotanus wrote:
> > Ivan, I do understand what you mean, I really do.
> > The CVS vs SVN just isn't a good example IMO because there was no other
> way
> > to get empty folders stored in CVS.
> > A very important secondary reason is that the information must
> necessarily
> > be retrieved from CVS as you put it in, that is the reason it exists!
> While
> > a JCR can be compared more to a database: you decide how to put the
> > information in, how to get it out and what it all means.
> Thank you for your example it is the most advanced work-around that I may
> think
> of. And I can see it working to ease developers pain.
>   As a side effect this solution will force to relax node type definition.
> For instance (foo:required-field) node type should be added.
> As well as value type is not known at this moment unless foo:field
> node-type has
> value;integer-value;date-value, ... etc. Or some other mechanism to define
> the type.
> Again, thank you for an excellent work-around.

And thanks for an incredibly sarcastic response, was that really necessary?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message