jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From IvanLatysh <i...@yourmail.com>
Subject Re: 3.1.3.1 Removing Items
Date Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:29:10 GMT
Tako Schotanus wrote:

>> Tako Schotanus wrote:
>>
>> > Ivan, I do understand what you mean, I really do.
>> > The CVS vs SVN just isn't a good example IMO because there was no other
>> way
>> > to get empty folders stored in CVS.
>> > A very important secondary reason is that the information must
>> necessarily
>> > be retrieved from CVS as you put it in, that is the reason it exists!
>> While
>> > a JCR can be compared more to a database: you decide how to put the
>> > information in, how to get it out and what it all means.
>> Thank you for your example it is the most advanced work-around that I may
>> think
>> of. And I can see it working to ease developers pain.
>>
>>   As a side effect this solution will force to relax node type 
>> definition.
>> For instance (foo:required-field) node type should be added.
>> As well as value type is not known at this moment unless foo:field
>> node-type has
>> value;integer-value;date-value, ... etc. Or some other mechanism to 
>> define
>> the type.
>>
>> Again, thank you for an excellent work-around.
> 
> And thanks for an incredibly sarcastic response, was that really necessary?
I am sorry.
I didn't mean to be sarcastic at all, I expressed my gratitude without any sarcasm.
I am sorry if in any way I hurt your feeling.

-- 
Ivan Latysh
ivan@yourmail.com

Mime
View raw message