jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: 3.1.3.1 Removing Items
Date Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:16:17 GMT
IvanLatysh wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> I strongly disagree. Being absent, and having an empty string value 
>> are completely different things. Font instance, you can't have a 
>> "null" attribute value in XML.
> XML attribute isn't type strict as JCR is.
> So parameter.setValue(valueFactory.createValue((Double)null)) should 
> result a parameter of type 'Double' with null value.

OK, let's just agree that we disagree here.

> ...
>> You can do that as well, can't you?
> Yes I can do that. And as I sad: API is not consistent.
> Spec promote usage of "p.setValue((Value)null)" as the way to remove the 
> property when it should say to use "p.remove();" instead.
> ...

I totally agree that teaching people to use p.remove() would be preferable.

> I believe it is a community process so committee will discuss it.
> And again it is funny to hear that it is a major change when XPath just 
> has been dropped.
> Be reasonable, if you brake the spec, at least fix the obvious bugs.
> Anyway 2.0 won't be compatible with 1.0
> ...

I personally think that 2.0 *should* be as compatible as possible (and 
yes, that means that people should be ably to rely on XPath).

Best regards, Julian




Mime
View raw message