jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "harvey waters" <harvey.wat...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Audit Trail
Date Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:43:03 GMT
We decided against it initially because the data is very simple and would't
require the overheads of versioning, security checking etc.

On 7/4/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/4/07, harvey waters <harvey.waters@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > We're trying to implement an audit trail of activity, (who's adding
> content,
> > deleting e.t.c). Our first thought was to record the activity in a
> seperate
> > database but this means using distributed transactions....
>
> Why not record the audit trail info in the repository?
>
> I'm doing this in one of our apps, using a separate tree which stores
> audit trail events under paths like
>
>   /audittrail/2007/20070530/event-1
>
> It works well for me, and avoids the use of a different storage mechanism.
>
> -Bertrand
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message