Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: Clustering - keeping the journal in the same DB as
 workspace data?
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:37:41 -0400
Message-ID: <2123A704743EB34295B4AA1DB09475680227C43D@jaxmsx02.nemours.org>
In-Reply-To: <66c10f230706250536n51da5686rba760768e2bd58a8@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Clustering - keeping the journal in the same DB as
 workspace data?
Thread-Index: Ace3JXr1VTWYkDrPRpSMe71c0DbA4gAAA7fw
From: "Amir Mistric" <amistric@nemours.org>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is it also OK if they are in the same schema as the data? Looking at the =
table names seems like there would be no "collision"

Thanks
=20
Amir
=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dominique.pfister@gmail.com=20
> [mailto:dominique.pfister@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Dominique Pfister
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 8:36 AM
> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Clustering - keeping the journal in the same DB=20
> as workspace data?
>=20
> Hi Amir,
>=20
> yes, this is ok. You can specify a different schema for the=20
> journal in the DatabaseJournal's configuration if you prefer.=20
> The journal tables are called JOURNAL and GLOBAL_REVISION and=20
> are automatically created on startup.
>=20
> Kind regards
> Dominique
>=20
> On 6/25/07, Amir Mistric <amistric@nemours.org> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > If I have Jackrabbit configured to use Oracle Bundle PM and=20
> Oracle FS and I want to set it up for clustering...
> > Is it OK to use the same DB for the journal? Or does it=20
> have to be a different one?
> > Will the journal tables be created automatically after I=20
> add clustering configuration?
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Amir
> >
>=20