Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 9343 invoked from network); 14 May 2007 07:18:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2007 07:18:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 21473 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2007 07:18:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 21456 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2007 07:18:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 21447 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2007 07:18:54 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 00:18:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.247 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.247] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.247) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 00:18:47 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c37so402593anc for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 00:18:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UhVex4jxFq83H3no/W5fJyw841yQlF7REoZO7tWpVBUX81/CVjxWXZU7fV8qvni5e6sq5xSnw3ARfkLfe895zoTPeSD0IOe6XrIzW590kgIOF3ZcQdcf3fN8kagVXtAx4v58aOiH63cDztMdmfMaFzU8iYS7uHrjsaY+lFlgdR0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=r/TXWk0YczHfViDe5NqdTjnIIfkSh1EJ+W9x7P5EC/q0l8KTUkZ2zmolDhPRoLqkLL7QG+WIbY86c4Twb41C3GE2za6L3bRB7DdjikG5E7sGWymri0JCuy3yrJTngzRPD6gZbrDX/hra+pCmLCxQkPZiWBhnm4C1ATZ1befSTAI= Received: by 10.100.251.9 with SMTP id y9mr4215859anh.1179127106494; Mon, 14 May 2007 00:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.191.18 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 00:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <510143ac0705140018l78aaadd6y64ef1999ac84c953@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:18:26 +0300 From: "Jukka Zitting" To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Use of Jackrabbit in commercial product and scalability numbers for Jackrabbit w/w/o RMI In-Reply-To: <4647F07A.7070507@sun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4647F07A.7070507@sun.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On 5/14/07, ruchi goel wrote: > I would like to know if anyone is using Jackrabbit in live > commercial/OS project/product . I guess there are already quite a few people doing so. See the JCR Links page on the Jackrabbit wiki for some commercial applications based on Jackrabbit. > Also , does anyone have any scalability numbers for Jackrabbit, > preferably with RMI. What sort of scalability are you interested in? Number of nodes, total amount of content, number of (concurrent) users, perfromance under load, ... Note that the current RMI layer is heavily constrained by network latency as it normally uses a large number of small requests. For best performance you should typically use a local Jackrabbit instance. BR, Jukka Zitting