jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Perez" <mper...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Use of Jackrabbit in commercial product and scalability numbers for Jackrabbit w/w/o RMI
Date Wed, 16 May 2007 13:24:38 GMT
That's very true.

You can do the same over http with just some input/output stream bridging.
Have tried it, and it's quite performing, and also you can move massive
chunks of data with a very small heap.


On 5/16/07, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> On 5/16/07, Dominique de Waleffe <dominique.dewaleffe@denali.be> wrote:
> > It works ok for the load it has to cope with, but I cannot say that the
> > server is stressed by the number of operations [it basically serves
> > large files (videos)] and the site does not have the load of youtube...
> That's a good point. The RMI layer is actually pretty efficient from a
> bandwidth perspective, i.e it supports efficient streaming of binary
> values.
> BR,
> Jukka Zitting

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message