Hi,
On 5/15/07, Sudhan <s.kanade@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK so I will have to use these two optional classes.
>
> At present i was just using the binary source for jackrabbit-webapp-1.3.war
> and deploying it on JBoss Server. So now i will have to modify the source
> and use JackrabbitServerAdaptorFactory instead of ServerAdapterFactory and
> similarly will have to change same stuff on client application and rebuild
> the respective jars.
Ah, good point... We should have changed jackrabbit-webapp to use the
Jackrabbit extensions by default.
> If you have any snippet of these changes will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Once again thanks for all your support.
No problem. Could you file an improvement request in Jira for using
the Jackrabbit RMI extensions by default in jackrabbit-webapp. I can
make the required changes in code.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
|