Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 96321 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 16:41:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 16:41:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 51121 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 16:41:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 51101 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 16:41:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 51092 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 16:41:22 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:41:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:41:13 -0700 Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HYPaP-0007qi-9K for users@jackrabbit.apache.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:40:53 -0700 Message-ID: <9794383.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Joshua Levy To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: poll on jcr query usage In-Reply-To: <4610C9EB.5040200@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: levy@csl.sri.com References: <4610C9EB.5040200@gmx.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [X] I primarily use XPath [ ] I primarily use SQL [ ] I use both XPath and SQL If there was an API to construct a query I would ... [X] ... use it /instead/ of the existing XPath or SQL languages. [ ] ... use it only for occasionally. [ ] ... not use it at all. Also, even if the latter API has optimizations that make query reuse faster than with XPath, it would of course be useful if it allowed you to recover the equivalent XPath (or SQL) queries, effectively providing an XPath formulation toolkit. Joshua -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/poll-on-jcr-query-usage-tf3504518.html#a9794383 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.