Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 43451 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2007 10:31:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2007 10:31:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 20831 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2007 10:31:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 20763 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2007 10:31:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 20725 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2007 10:31:56 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:31:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of michael.neale@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.249 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.249] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:31:48 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d18so2555415and for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:31:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=AoVmRbEAeaaurcGWACNbu/7kCP/S8UgTdPMolJthOX1pu2DJRhi793fzX2ugdAiwXBRqzfY9C+Pdi7LQJsX34c9bJ3ITqO7jLHY9ZSAOTImNf4SuB5zzYSAefXJ+BHSPK3Zg3T0Itd4QWiPv1KbP4q7zNMq6q46MGcZqb5JsU58= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=VD+oeqCOixOUNRR8LdowiLdZvjw1V6F1ONz44yoj/8M5UCzJBbUgEslz9Tmx5DvSbFMXrq1AIrFIUiG1afT76UVC0JyOuh08nvvBCsF0Kd7Z71+aXgCroOWrLhMYZ5ZlaHE13e3qomtVaJk6y8QVakLbFRqhaxU1MtPl3Hfl/8w= Received: by 10.100.191.5 with SMTP id o5mr4425194anf.1177410687739; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.41.6 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <96ab3ced0704240331o63b2fa38q92ed8943fc8c622@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:31:27 +1000 From: "Michael Neale" To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.3 maven packaging - missing Log4J etc? In-Reply-To: <510143ac0704240031y2dfa6f5eu8551869fc871a95a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_250955_15873228.1177410687346" References: <96ab3ced0704232155h5a83962fg13c7b2a8185dc523@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0704240031y2dfa6f5eu8551869fc871a95a@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_250955_15873228.1177410687346 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline right - so I can switch logging implementations by just choosing them - cool. On 4/24/07, Jukka Zitting wrote: > > Hi, > > On 4/24/07, Michael Neale wrote: > > I may be jumping the gun, but I just tried upgrading to 1.3, and it > doesn't > > include Log4j or SL4j in the dependencies, yet this is needed (at least) > by > > TransientRepository - an oversight or am I doing something wrong? > > We've upgraded to a more recent SLF4J version that is split to > separate api and implementation dependencies. The slf4j-api dependency > is in the compile scope, but the log4j binding, slf4j-log4j12, is not. > The idea is that we don't want to default everyone to use log4j, and > that users should select which binding they want to use. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > ------=_Part_250955_15873228.1177410687346--