Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 69433 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2007 08:17:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2007 08:17:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 44166 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2007 08:17:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 44143 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2007 08:17:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 44130 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2007 08:17:42 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:17:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.242] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:17:34 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d18so1627298and for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:17:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=K8KYGtotgwY3dILgGMCInEAjFXhSUcgIyY3l+3fj/T/HSfP1K2ZbcfLGWD0OFVHl4dLzDJR1rSZ2Ou/YiwPf+aZFjTGfQoJNI9Vm1smgBlNpmUEQaKpb2HwvkE4iSNlYHRshCbBt9RCoUiFhJR3lM/ehyLvCnfCXjxjDGKn+kWw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MGg3vIVijRvxvXlkWDXFyLo71YRKw6WxlnNCGU9UF6sYHM3LPSrMk5BwZzQWzaxMWHGguKe9cV9BVYFvkJMlPXfU/H64s5Ewig9mV2QWCtaiLZoFM+pTUYpWOK93trM9RvjOv2isNNnsBTe3LMDWo0v72tqA5S1wNBgll3+kVp4= Received: by 10.100.138.2 with SMTP id l2mr3651072and.1176625033407; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.191.8 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <510143ac0704150117m642800edud6a06d9b0edce959@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:17:13 +0300 From: "Jukka Zitting" To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: JackRabbit Vs Alfresco In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9956844.post@talk.nabble.com> <9957486.post@talk.nabble.com> <1176386887.2708.1.camel@dev2.dbgroups.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On 4/15/07, Danner, Russ wrote: > Another important thing to note about the implementation is that > currently the Alfresco JCR implementation has to run "in-process." Note that the same applies to by default also to Jackrabbit. You can use the jackrabbit-jcr-rmi remoting layer with any JCR implementation, so it should work fine also with Alfresco. BR, Jukka Zitting