jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alessandro Bologna" <alessandro.bolo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: importing jackrabbit into jackrabbit
Date Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:35:39 GMT
I think that David did say that there are use cases when referential
integrity is important. I took his comment about "re-educating" in
this context, and honestly, I tend to agree that in some case DB folks
use super normalized schemas when maybe it would not have been needed.
Sometime I feel that, left on their own, they would get rid on
integers, because you can always replace them with references to a
table of ints (from 1 to 1e10, I guess).

Just half kidding.

I do agree that the best thing right now is to "fix" the behavior in
Jackrabbit, leveraging delta changes, and at the same time, maybe
create a nice entry on the wiki about when to use and not to use


On 4/27/07, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> On 4/27/07, Tako Schotanus <quintesse@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So yes, I agree that Jackrabbit should try to make this use-case perform
> > well but not because of uneducated RDMS programmers but because
> > sometimes a lot of references are necessary and no amount of redesigning
> > your data structures will help.
> +1
> BR,
> Jukka Zitting

View raw message