Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of marcel.reutegger@gmx.net
 designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <45D5B3C0.1000000@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:38:08 +0100
From: Marcel Reutegger <marcel.reutegger@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why these two queries don't return the same?
References: <1171622403.10018.18.camel@antares>
In-Reply-To: <1171622403.10018.18.camel@antares>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Paco Avila wrote:
> I think this two queries are "equivalents" because both search in the
> node content, but the results are differents:
> 
> 	//element(*,okm:document)/@jcr:path[jcr:contains(okm:content,'apache')]
> order by @jcr:score descending
> 
> 	//element(*,okm:resource)/@jcr:path[jcr:contains(.,'apache')] order by
> @jcr:score descending

The queries actually look malformed. Shouldn't it read:

//element(*,okm:document)[jcr:contains(okm:content,'apache')]
  order by @jcr:score descending

and

//element(*,okm:resource)[jcr:contains(.,'apache')]
  order by @jcr:score descending

?

But even then, the nodes in the query result will be different because of the 
element() node test. the first query will return okm:document nodes, whereas the 
second query will return okm:resource nodes.

regards
  marcel