jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefan Guggisberg" <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Persistence Manager in Production Environment
Date Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:33:58 GMT
i'd suggest, for now, using jackrabbit's default configuration, i.e.
DerbyPersistenceManager, since it's been extensively tested and since
it is pretty fast (considerably faster than the oracle pm).

cheers
stefan

On 2/21/07, KÖLL Claus <C.KOELL@tirol.gv.at> wrote:
> We are on the road to use jackrabbit in our production environment but i'm not sure
> which persistence manager we should use.
>
> I have made some tests with the j2c adapter in combination with the oracle db pm
> to get a atomar transaction through the pm.
> A reason for db is also the easy way to backup/restore the data.
>
> On the other hand is the filesystem, no atomar transaction but it is fast. we think we
get about 1-2 Million documents in jackrabbit
> and then the backup is no more really possible on filesystem beacuse if i use objectpersistenmanager
i get about
> 6-10 files per node on fs (6*2Million files effectivity). On crash to recover these files
take really long :-)
>
> A good message is that day will offer there pm's, so the node propertys will no more
be stored in seperate files ..
>
> I hope i get some experience ...
> thanks
> claus
>

Mime
View raw message