jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stefan Guggisberg" <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Non-orderable child nodes
Date Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:38:16 GMT
On 12/14/06, James Hang <jhang@bea.com> wrote:
>
> So there's no real benefit on making child nodes non-orderable, e.g. no
> performance gains?

no, not in jackrabbit.

i'd rephrase your statement as follows:
in jackrabbit there's no performance loss when making child nodes orderable.

cheers
stefan

>
>
> Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
> >
> > On 12/14/06, James Hang <jhang@bea.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> How does Jackrabbit handle non-orderable child nodes?  e.g. when you call
> >> Node.getNodes() on a non-orderable node, does it return the nodes in a
> >> random order?  Can the order change at any time?
> >
> > it's implementation dependant according to "4.4.2 Non-orderable Child
> > Nodes"
> > of the jsr 170 spec. in jackrabbit the order of non-orderable child nodes
> > is preserved, internally there's no difference between orderable and
> > non-orderable child nodes.
> >
> > cheers
> > stefan
> >
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Non-orderable-child-nodes-tf2817547.html#a7864219
> >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Non-orderable-child-nodes-tf2817547.html#a7878698
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
View raw message