jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Hang <jh...@bea.com>
Subject Re: Non-orderable child nodes
Date Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:46:40 GMT

So there's no real benefit on making child nodes non-orderable, e.g. no
performance gains?


Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
> 
> On 12/14/06, James Hang <jhang@bea.com> wrote:
>>
>> How does Jackrabbit handle non-orderable child nodes?  e.g. when you call
>> Node.getNodes() on a non-orderable node, does it return the nodes in a
>> random order?  Can the order change at any time?
> 
> it's implementation dependant according to "4.4.2 Non-orderable Child
> Nodes"
> of the jsr 170 spec. in jackrabbit the order of non-orderable child nodes
> is preserved, internally there's no difference between orderable and
> non-orderable child nodes.
> 
> cheers
> stefan
> 
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Non-orderable-child-nodes-tf2817547.html#a7864219
>> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Non-orderable-child-nodes-tf2817547.html#a7878698
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message